- Benchmark ASINB0GTP3FQ3Q
- MarketplaceUS
- Category ID3024205011
- Analyzed Products
- Keywordpet supplies
- Price Range-
- Minimum Net Profit Margin10.00%
- MOQ100
- Est. Purchasing Cost¥107.71estimated
- Data Date2026-07-30
- Your Budget (for new listing) (CNY)¥500,000.00
Report summary from Keble AI Agent: Listing
这个市场不值得进入，核心原因是新品牌几乎没有跑通，且已经出现同质化竞争和低回报信号。 目前可验证样本里只有 oneisall 一个新品牌，2 个新上架产品里 0 个可确认盈利；新品牌新上架盈利率是 0%，市场总体也只有 1 个明确亏损样本，说明不是“可复制机会”，而是“单点高投入、低确定性”。
证据很直接：B0GTP3FQ3Q 这条产品线价格 $179.51，月销约 50，月营收 $8,975.50，早期已投入约 $16,610.96，其中广告就有 $4,298.92，但仍然亏损。 它只有 13 条评价，却已经没跑通，说明不是靠低门槛就能活；失败原因也很清楚：核心功能和竞品高度同质，主要卖点只是无绳、低噪、双速、电池可拆卸和 A5 刀头，属于明显的同质化竞争。更关键的是，最近两次新上架都没有出现盈利，市场节奏不是变好，而是持续偏弱；从时间上看，2026 年新上架 2 个样本里 2 个都没有形成正向结果，已经足够说明现在不是适合新进场的窗口。
Recommended Products Features Direction
These products have successfully captured market share and are profitable. Their design and features are suggested for your investment, based on market competition, saturation, and demand.
New Brands
VS
Old Brands
Green indicates better success rate, red indicates poorer success rate. If you are a new brand, focus on the left side; if you are an old brand, focus on the right side.
New Brands
#Budget Requirement
Listing这个市场不值得进入：新品牌新上架成功率为0%，整体利润为0%，而且投资门槛高。 用户预算是50万人民币，能覆盖单品前期起步，但不足以对抗需要UL认证、强品牌投入和持续拉新的打法；更关键的是，当前看到的可验证样本里，市场已经在往“高投入、低回报”走。
Early sourcing + logistics + marketing budget (USD)N/AExplains the budgetWith all these investments, who has profitable new releases
How many new listings are released by old brands?0.00%New listing success rate (new brands):0.00%Potential certificate expensesUL CertificationSome categories may not originally require certain certificates for entry; however, some products may target specific features (e.g. Bluetooth) or customers (e.g. children), and additional certificates may be required in the target marketplace (e.g. FCC, CPC).
Alternatives- 宠物店/本地美容师上门洗剪服务：对偶尔需要全套修毛、打结处理或怕自己操作失误的用户，更省心，单次付费即可，不用一次性投入高价设备。
- 低价入门级宠物电推剪套装（含限位梳）：如果只是家庭日常修脚、修耳边和局部修整，几十美元级别的基础款更容易接受，学习成本也更低。
- 宠物美容课程/视频教学 + 手工梳理工具：对想先自己尝试但不确定是否长期使用的用户，可以先用课程搭配梳子、开结梳、剪刀等低成本工具，逐步替代专业电推剪。
- 租借或借用宠物美容设备：在社区宠物群、宠物店或邻里平台短期借用/租赁，适合低频使用场景，避免购买高价专业设备。
- 宠物美容会员卡/包月洗护：若用户主要需求是定期护理而非自己操作，店铺会员制通常比购买高端推剪更可控，也能把维护、换刀片、保养问题转给服务方。
- 部分场景改用脱毛梳/开结梳/针梳：对于只是处理浮毛、轻微打结或日常维护的用户，这类工具更便宜、更容易上手，也更不依赖电池和刀头规格。
Alternative solutions may pose a risk to your investment in certain markets.
#Brands Investment Analysis
Listing这个市场不适合进入：当前已经是高风险的价格战/低成功率市场，且几乎没有可复制的正面案例。 现有数据里，市场可识别产品的盈利率是0.00%，新上架产品盈利率也是0.00%；品牌样本只有1个新品牌 oneisall，没有老品牌样本，说明样本虽小，但方向已经很差，不能把它当成适合大品牌或小商家入场的机会。
证据很直接：oneisall 这条线只有 2 个可识别产品，1 个明确亏损、1 个利润状态不明，没有任何可确认盈利产品。 亏损款是 B0GTP3FQ3Q，价格 $179.51，月销 50，月营收 $8,975.50，已投入早期资金 $16,610.96，其中广告就占 $4,298.92；它只有 13 条评价，远不到“靠自然口碑起量”的水平，但还是没跑通，说明这个价位不是靠低门槛就能复制成功。它的卖点也很普通：无绳、低噪、双速、电池可拆卸、A5 刀头，和竞品高度同质，属于“看起来能卖、实际打不出差异”的典型失败样本。另一个 ASIN B0H7VVR9G9 仅能看到“利润状态不明”，不能算成功案例。市场节奏上，2026 年才出现这两个新产品，月度和年度新品牌新增都很低，没有看到健康增长，更没有看到可持续放量的证据。
给你最关键的结论：不要进这个市场。 大品牌也不值得重投，因为现有样本没有证明“大投入能换来盈利”；小商家更不该进，因为没有低评价、低投入、真实跑通的成功样本可学。可借鉴的只有负面案例：不要做和 B0GTP3FQ3Q 一样的同质化产品，不要指望 $16,610 级别的早期投入就能解决问题，不要把 13 条评价当作真实起飞信号。若一定要找对标，B0GTP3FQ3Q 只能作为“避坑样本”，而不是跟随对象。
Least investment in new productsMost investment in new productsNew products with Highest revenueoneisall
Recent Monthly Revenue (USD):$8,975.50(50pcs/month)B0GTP3FQ3Q (4.4/5 (13 Reviews))Brand is a new entry in this marketNew ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQUnderperformingNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQ#Differentiations
Unique productsCommon productsDifferentiation:- Product features and designs are too common without differentiation
B0GTP3FQ3Q (4.4/5 (13 Reviews))Brand is a new entry in this marketNew ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQUnderperformingNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQSales & BSR
#Net Profit Margins: All vs New
Listing这个市场不值得进入：样本里只有1个新品牌 oneisall，1个新上架新品 B0GTP3FQ3Q 就已经是非盈利，而且新品牌新品盈利率是 0%，当前看不到适合小商家复制的成功路径。 更关键的是，市场里没有旧品牌样本、没有足够的盈利新产品样本，说明现在不是“可验证机会”，而是“单点高投入、低确定性”的状态。
Profitability difficultyUnknown - Insufficient New ReleasesAll products distribution on different profit levels
All products profit ratio distribution, including all products. For products with insufficient sales or missing profit ratio data, they will be categorized into other rows. This distribution included products that cannot determine the release date.
x < -10.0%-10.0% <= x < 0.0%0.0% <= x < 10.0%10.0% <= x < 20.0%20.0% <= x < 30.0%30.0% <= x < 40.0%x >= 40.0%otherNew products distribution on different profit levels
This are the profit ratios of all new products. There are products without sufficient sales, no more than 100pcs in 3 months, or no profit ratio data, or just released. Those will be considered as 'other'
x < -10.0%-10.0% <= x < 0.0%0.0% <= x < 10.0%10.0% <= x < 20.0%20.0% <= x < 30.0%30.0% <= x < 40.0%x >= 40.0%other#Top Products by Net Profit Margin
Top 20 Non-Profitable Products
Products with negative profitability ranked by lowest profit value. Only includes products classified as non-profitable regardless of release date.
B0GTP3FQ3Qoneisall2026-04-22No$179.5150pcs$8975.541.95%$3765.23Top 20 Non-Profitable New Products
New products with negative profitability ranked by lowest profit value. Only includes newly released products classified as non-profitable.
B0GTP3FQ3Qoneisall2026-04-22No$179.5150pcs$8975.541.95%$3765.23#New Product Success Rates
Listing这个市场不适合进入，结论很明确：新品牌和老品牌的可识别利润率都是0%，而且最近进入的产品也没有出现稳定盈利，属于高风险、低回报的市场。 你有 50万 CNY 预算，表面上足够覆盖单个ASIN前期投入，但当前样本里唯一清晰可见的新品牌 oneisall 只有 1 个明确亏损产品，品牌层面成功率 0%，并且这个产品是 2026年4月才进入，说明新入场并没有跑出可复制的盈利模型。
New products success rate.
What is the ratio of profitable products
Profitable (Unidentifiable released date)Profitable (Old product)Profitable (New product)Profitable (New product on old listing)New products but non profitableNo data availableNonprofitable new products divide by brands
What is the ratio of different brands owning all nonprofitable new products
oneisall#Success Rate by Entry Time
Listing这个市场不值得进入，已经接近/处于过热竞争状态。 近端新增节奏没有放缓，但新品牌的成功几乎没有出现；相反，最新可见的新入场案例里，oneisall 的新产品 B0GTP3FQ3Q 以 41.9% 毛利率却仍被判定为非盈利、销量不活跃，说明现在不是“有利润就能活”的市场，而是“要靠更强投放和更高投入才勉强跑得动”的市场。
How many products released each year
Y-axis is product counts. X-axis is time period. For each time period, there are 2 column, each column is a released type of a product. Columns are in following orders: New product, New product on old listing
How many products released each month
Y-axis is product counts. X-axis is time period. For each time period, there are 2 column, each column is a released type of a product. Columns are in following orders: New product, New product on old listing
#Net Profit Margins by Entry Time
Different profit ratios of products released in year
Header is the profit ratios and first column is different time period. Each cells includes how many products are relased at the specific timerange and has a corresponding profit ratios. Only profitable and with active sales (more than 100 pcs in 3 months) will be considered. Any products without sufficient sold units in 3 months will be marked as 'other'.
Time/Profit% x < -10.0% -10.0% <= x < 0.0% 0.0% <= x < 10.0% 10.0% <= x < 20.0% 20.0% <= x < 30.0% 30.0% <= x < 40.0% x >= 40.0% other 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2024 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 ≥ 10% Profitable< 10% UnprofitableUnidentifiableDifferent profit ratios of products released in month
Header is the profit ratios and first column is different time period. Each cells includes how many products are relased at the specific timerange and has a corresponding profit ratios. Only profitable and with active sales (more than 100 pcs in 3 months) will be considered. Any products without sufficient sold units in 3 months will be marked as 'other'.
Time/Profit% x < -10.0% -10.0% <= x < 0.0% 0.0% <= x < 10.0% 10.0% <= x < 20.0% 20.0% <= x < 30.0% 30.0% <= x < 40.0% x >= 40.0% other 2025/8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2026/5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ≥ 10% Profitable< 10% UnprofitableUnidentifiable#Case Study
Success Cases