- Benchmark ASINB0GTRT9P2L
- MarketplaceUS
- Category ID1090768
- Analyzed Products
- Keywordkitchen appliance
- Price Range-
- Minimum Net Profit Margin10.00%
- MOQ100
- Est. Purchasing CostNo price data
- Data Date2026-07-22
- Your Budget (for new listing) (CNY)¥500,000.00
Report summary from Keble AI Agent: Listing
这个市场不值得进入，而且已经出现明显的低价内卷信号：现有样本里只有一个新品牌 CenliBaw，入场后没有任何可验证的盈利，新品盈利率是 0%，品牌盈利率也是 0%。更关键的是，当前唯一可见的产品 B0GTRT9P2L 售价 $6.43，早期投入约 $964.50，最终利润率却是 -22.13%，说明这不是“多投一点就能跑通”的市场，而是基础模型就跑不通。
Recommended Products Features Direction
These products have successfully captured market share and are profitable. Their design and features are suggested for your investment, based on market competition, saturation, and demand.
New Brands
VS
Old Brands
Green indicates better success rate, red indicates poorer success rate. If you are a new brand, focus on the left side; if you are an old brand, focus on the right side.
New Brands
#Budget Requirement
Listing结论很明确：这个市场不值得进入，用户预算500000 CNY表面上足够，但市场本身已经是价格战高风险区，且当前样本里没有任何可复制的真实盈利案例。 进入它不只是“钱够不够”的问题，而是“进去了能不能活下来”的问题；按现有数据，这个答案是否定的。
Early sourcing + logistics + marketing budget (USD)N/AExplains the budgetWith all these investments, who has profitable new releases
How many new listings are released by old brands?0.00%New listing success rate (new brands):0.00%Alternatives- 普通梅森罐平盖（一次性金属罐盖）——价格通常更低、超市和五金店更容易买到，适合只需要常规密封而不追求真空的人。
- 通用硅胶/可重复使用罐盖——通常比专用真空盖更便宜，清洗和重复使用更方便，适合日常短期储存。
- 带抽气阀的通用食品保鲜盖/保鲜密封盖——不需要匹配特定品牌整套系统，用户可直接配手动泵或小型抽气器，使用门槛更低。
- 食品保鲜袋 + 真空夹链封口夹/手动抽气器——单次成本往往更低，适合少量食材临时保鲜，比专用梅森罐盖更灵活。
- 夹扣式玻璃保鲜罐/密封罐（非真空）——购买和使用都简单，价格通常更友好，适合不需要长期真空存储的家庭场景。
Alternative solutions may pose a risk to your investment in certain markets.
#Brands Investment Analysis
Listing这不是一个适合进入的市场：当前样本里新品牌入场直接亏损，且没有任何可验证的新品牌盈利案例；按现有数据看，小品牌和大品牌都不该贸然进场。 以 CenliBaw 为代表的新品牌，单个 ASIN B0GTRT9P2L 价格 6.43 美元，早期投入约 964.50 美元，但利润率只有 -22.1%，评论只有 4 条、评分 3.2，销量也被标记为不活跃，说明不是“做出就能卖”的赛道，而是低客单价、成本被 FBA 和投放迅速吃掉的高风险盘。
New products with Highest revenueMost investment in new productsLeast investment in new productsCenliBaw
Recent Monthly Revenue (USD):-(-)B0GTRT9P2L (3.2/5 (4 Reviews))Brand is a new entry in this marketNew ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQUnderperformingNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQ#Differentiations
Unique productsCommon productsDifferentiation:- Product features and designs are too common without differentiation
B0GTRT9P2L (3.2/5 (4 Reviews))Brand is a new entry in this marketNew ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQUnderperformingNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQSales & BSR
#Net Profit Margins: All vs New
Listing这个市场不值得进入，结论很明确：已出现明显的价格战和低利润陷阱，新品牌成功率极低。 目前能看到的核心样本里，唯一可识别的新品牌 CenliBaw 在 ASIN B0GTRT9P2L 上是负利润，毛利率 -22.13%，售价只有 $6.43，而且品牌层面 0% 盈利率、0% 新品盈利率、0 收入，这说明不是“普通竞争”，而是连最基础的起量都没有跑通。
证据很直接：当前市场分布里，已识别的新产品利润全部落在 负区间，没有任何可见的正利润样本；这意味着对新卖家来说，市场不是健康竞争，而是 低价内卷+高失败率。按你的规则，利润率低于10% 的产品会被视为高风险价格战区，而现在连正利润都看不到，更谈不上 15% 以上的可接受水平。结合品牌表现，CenliBaw 属于新进入品牌但没有任何盈利支撑，也没有显示出靠创新或品牌力打开空间的迹象；在这种环境下，小卖家不仅要覆盖选品、备货、物流和广告，还很可能需要额外的研发、品牌或认证投入，500000 CNY 也不构成安全入场理由。
如果一定要看“可抄作业”的对象，当前没有真正合格的小卖家成功案例可参考；大品牌和小卖家都不适合进场。唯一能明确给出的结论是：当前市场更像失败样本聚集地，而不是机会市场，不要推进。
Profitability difficultyUnknown - Insufficient New ReleasesAll products distribution on different profit levels
All products profit ratio distribution, including all products. For products with insufficient sales or missing profit ratio data, they will be categorized into other rows. This distribution included products that cannot determine the release date.
x < -10.0%-10.0% <= x < 0.0%0.0% <= x < 10.0%10.0% <= x < 20.0%20.0% <= x < 30.0%30.0% <= x < 40.0%x >= 40.0%otherNew products distribution on different profit levels
This are the profit ratios of all new products. There are products without sufficient sales, no more than 100pcs in 3 months, or no profit ratio data, or just released. Those will be considered as 'other'
x < -10.0%-10.0% <= x < 0.0%0.0% <= x < 10.0%10.0% <= x < 20.0%20.0% <= x < 30.0%30.0% <= x < 40.0%x >= 40.0%other#Top Products by Net Profit Margin
Top 20 Non-Profitable Products
Products with negative profitability ranked by lowest profit value. Only includes products classified as non-profitable regardless of release date.
B0GTRT9P2LCenliBaw2026-05-16No$6.43-pcs$--22.13%$-Top 20 Non-Profitable New Products
New products with negative profitability ranked by lowest profit value. Only includes newly released products classified as non-profitable.
B0GTRT9P2LCenliBaw2026-05-16No$6.43-pcs$--22.13%$-#New Product Success Rates
Listing这个市场不值得进入，属于明显的低成功率、低利润、强竞争市场。 现有数据里，新品整体盈利率是0%，新品牌新品盈利率也是0%，而唯一被抓到的样本 CenliBaw / B0GTRT9P2L 直接亏损22.1%，说明这里不是“有机会但要拼投入”，而是“连基础模型都跑不通”的市场。
证据很直接： CenliBaw 这条新品 B0GTRT9P2L 售价6.43美元，只有4条评价、3.2分，属于新品牌新上架，但不是成功样本；它的早期投入约964.50美元，其中广告273.24美元，结果仍然是非盈利、销量不稳、活跃销售为否。更关键的是，它的打法没有差异化，产品只是普通梅森罐真空密封盖组合装，市场反馈点名了缺乏独特性、市场太小或竞争太激烈、利润率本来就不高。按你的规则，这种市场不但不是小商家友好型，反而已经表现出价格战和高失败风险。
对两类卖家的结论都一样： 大品牌也不该进，因为这里看不到可复制的高胜率结构；小商家更不该进，因为连“真实小商家成功案例”都没有，且当前样本没有任何<300评价且真正跑通的成功者。这个市场现在最强的信号不是机会，而是“0%新品盈利率 + 0%新品牌新品盈利率 + 单样本亏损22.1%”。
New products success rate.
What is the ratio of profitable products
Profitable (Unidentifiable released date)Profitable (Old product)Profitable (New product)Profitable (New product on old listing)New products but non profitableNo data availableNonprofitable new products divide by brands
What is the ratio of different brands owning all nonprofitable new products
CenliBaw#Success Rate by Entry Time
Listing这个市场现在不值得进入，结论很明确：新品牌几乎没有跑通，且已经出现低价、低利润、低活跃的失败信号。 目前能看到的唯一新品牌 CenliBaw，早期投入约 964.50 美元，但产品 B0GTRT9P2L 只有 4 个评价、3.2 星，利润率 -22.1%，销量也属于非活跃状态，说明连最基本的起量都没有做成。
How many products released each year
Y-axis is product counts. X-axis is time period. For each time period, there are 2 column, each column is a released type of a product. Columns are in following orders: New product, New product on old listing
How many products released each month
Y-axis is product counts. X-axis is time period. For each time period, there are 2 column, each column is a released type of a product. Columns are in following orders: New product, New product on old listing
#Net Profit Margins by Entry Time
Different profit ratios of products released in year
Header is the profit ratios and first column is different time period. Each cells includes how many products are relased at the specific timerange and has a corresponding profit ratios. Only profitable and with active sales (more than 100 pcs in 3 months) will be considered. Any products without sufficient sold units in 3 months will be marked as 'other'.
Time/Profit% x < -10.0% -10.0% <= x < 0.0% 0.0% <= x < 10.0% 10.0% <= x < 20.0% 20.0% <= x < 30.0% 30.0% <= x < 40.0% x >= 40.0% other 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2024 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ≥ 10% Profitable< 10% UnprofitableUnidentifiableDifferent profit ratios of products released in month
Header is the profit ratios and first column is different time period. Each cells includes how many products are relased at the specific timerange and has a corresponding profit ratios. Only profitable and with active sales (more than 100 pcs in 3 months) will be considered. Any products without sufficient sold units in 3 months will be marked as 'other'.
Time/Profit% x < -10.0% -10.0% <= x < 0.0% 0.0% <= x < 10.0% 10.0% <= x < 20.0% 20.0% <= x < 30.0% 30.0% <= x < 40.0% x >= 40.0% other 2025/7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2026/6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ≥ 10% Profitable< 10% UnprofitableUnidentifiable#Case Study
Success Cases