- Benchmark ASINB0GVYKT349
- MarketplaceUS
- Category ID695489011
- Analyzed Products
- Keywordhome storage
- Price Range-
- Minimum Net Profit Margin10.00%
- MOQ100
- Est. Purchasing CostNo price data
- Data Date2026-07-29
- Your Budget (for new listing) (CNY)¥500,000.00
Report summary from Keble AI Agent: Listing
结论很明确：这个市场不值得进入，已经处在明显的价格战区，且新品牌环境偏拥挤。 现有样本里，新产品成功率只有13.33%，新发布可盈利率只有12.50%，而且最近一年新品里绝大多数都在亏损或未跑通；这不是“还有空间”，而是“试错成本高、胜率低”。
证据上，竞争已经被少数老品牌和少量强新品卡住了。 市场里新品牌有9个、老品牌也有9个，但真正赚钱的新产品只有2个，分别是 STORAGE MANIAC 的 B0GGZVLCXD，利润率18.65%，月销100，月营收49.99万；以及 Fzzcvo 的 B0GVYKT349，利润率13.96%，月销100，月营收42.99万。相比之下，失败样本更多：Folzaelar 的 B0FVFXC99W 亏损51.85%，B0GL6FHJWZ 直接没有跑通；Greatingreat 的 B0FS71G8V4 亏损1.9%，B0G5FFS9JR 也不赚钱；Meikosks、KDNVS 也各有两条新款都失败。更关键的是，利润好的样本并不多，而且并不是低价随便复制就能成，Fzzcvo 这条盈利款依赖的是双分区、带盖、可移动分类收纳这些明确升级点，普通款式基本都被打回去。
对大品牌来说，可以进入但必须重投入，而且仍然不是好市场：STORAGE MANIAC 这类老品牌已有3个可识别样本，2个赚钱、1个不赚钱，说明它们靠规模、供应链和品牌压制还能活得好，但这不代表新玩家容易跟进。对小企业来说，不建议进入：500000 CNY 的预算能覆盖单个 ASIN 的前期启动，但对真正能跑通的样本而言，这笔钱只是起步，不包含研发、品牌和认证等长期成本；而且你能看到的“真成功”新品牌只有 Fzzcvo 的 B0GVYKT349，另一条同品牌新品就失败了，说明这不是稳定可复制的路径。市场走势也在变差，2026 年新品里失败样本密集出现，价格竞争正在加重。
Recommended Products Features Direction
These products have successfully captured market share and are profitable. Their design and features are suggested for your investment, based on market competition, saturation, and demand.
New Brands
VS
Old Brands
Green indicates better success rate, red indicates poorer success rate. If you are a new brand, focus on the left side; if you are an old brand, focus on the right side.
New Brands
Old Brands
#Budget Requirement
Listing这个市场不值得进入：已经明显进入价格战区，且对新品牌不友好。 你的预算 50万 CNY 当然能覆盖单个ASIN的前期启动，但按市场里能看到的样本，真正能跑通的新品门槛并不低，单靠这笔钱很难同时扛住备货、物流、投放和后续品牌/认证成本。
Early sourcing + logistics + marketing budget (USD)$2,994.75 - $2,994.75Explains the budgetWith all these investments, who has profitable new releases
How many new listings are released by old brands?12.50%New listing success rate (old brands):50.00%New listing success rate (new brands):7.14%Which new brands have these successful new listings?Which old brands have these successful new listings?Alternatives- 可折叠布艺脏衣篮/脏衣袋：通常更便宜、重量更轻，适合租房或临时收纳，且不用装轮子和框架。
- 门后挂式收纳袋：几乎不占地，安装简单，适合浴室、卧室门后做脏衣或杂物收纳。
- 塑料收纳箱/周转箱：价格往往更低，防潮、易清洁，也能兼作玩具、毛巾或洗衣用品收纳。
- 编织收纳篮：外观更像家居装饰，使用门槛低，适合放在卧室、客厅角落做轻量收纳。
- 普通洗衣袋+固定篮筐组合：先用便宜洗衣袋分类，再放入现有篮筐或角落，比购买带轮双格大号脏衣车更省钱。
Alternative solutions may pose a risk to your investment in certain markets.
#Brands Investment Analysis
Listing这个市场不值得进入，结论很明确：已经接近价格战区，且新品牌成功率只有12.5%，对小卖家和大品牌都不友好。 现在能看到的样本里，真正能赚钱的新入场只有 1 个：Fzzcvo 的 B0GVYKT349，利润率 14.0%，月销 100，月营收 $4,299，前期投入约 $9,672.75；但它的成功是建立在“做对旧款升级”的基础上，不是低成本复制就能复现。
New products with Highest revenueFzzcvo
Recent Monthly Revenue (USD):$4,299.00(100pcs/month)B0GVYKT349 (4.6/5 (118 Reviews))Brand is a new entry in this marketNew ReleaseSufficient Sales to Meet MOQWhite HatThis listing is deemed profitableOld brand with the most profitable new productsSTORAGE MANIAC
Recent Monthly Revenue (USD):$9,848.00(200pcs/month)B0DZBZJPH6 (4.8/5 (1023 Reviews))Brand is an old entry in this marketOld ReleaseSufficient Sales to Meet MOQOld ReleaseThis listing is deemed profitable
Recent Monthly Revenue (USD):$4,999.00(100pcs/month)B0GGZVLCXD (4.8/5 (1022 Reviews))Brand is an old entry in this marketNew ReleaseSufficient Sales to Meet MOQWhite HatThis listing is deemed profitableMost investment in new productsLeast investment in new productsFolzaelar
Recent Monthly Revenue (USD):-(-)B0GL6FHJWZBrand is a new entry in this marketNew ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQUnderperformingNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQRecent Monthly Revenue (USD):$536.50(50pcs/month)B0FVFXC99W (3.9/5 (28 Reviews))Brand is a new entry in this marketNew ReleaseSufficient Sales to Meet MOQWhite HatNet profit margin below 10.00%Least profitable new productsGreatingreat
Recent Monthly Revenue (USD):-(-)B0FS71G8V4 (4.2/5 (18 Reviews))Brand is a new entry in this marketNew ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQUnderperformingNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQRecent Monthly Revenue (USD):-(-)B0G5FFS9JRBrand is a new entry in this marketNew ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQUnderperformingNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQ#Differentiations
Unique productsCommon productsDifferentiation:- 米色外观更柔和，家居感更强
- |
- 双分区+滚轮+可拆洗内袋，功能组合更完整
- |
- 形态像移动式分类收纳车，区别于普通脏衣篮
B0DGQ4QX5X (4.6/5 (105 Reviews))Brand is an old entry in this marketOld ReleaseSufficient Sales to Meet MOQOld ReleaseThis listing is deemed profitableSales & BSR
Differentiation:- 工业风单桶大容量，和双分区款差异明显
- |
- 商用钢架结构，外观更偏实用型
- |
- 适合大户型/酒店等场景，尺寸和用途都更突出
B0C23WDX4B (4.8/5 (1023 Reviews))Brand is an old entry in this marketOld ReleaseSufficient Sales to Meet MOQOld ReleaseNet profit margin below 10.00%Sales & BSR
#Net Profit Margins: All vs New
Listing这个市场不适合进入：利润结构太薄，而且新品牌几乎没有真正的成功样本。 现有数据里，可识别利润的产品只有12.12%赚钱，新发布产品里只有12.50%赚钱；新产品利润带上，10%以下的占比明显偏高，已经接近价格战区，不是适合新手切入的市场。
从数据看，市场由少数强势品牌撑盘：STORAGE MANIAC 的两个核心产品都赚钱，B0DZBZJPH6 利润率17.19%，B0GGZVLCXD 利润率18.65%，月收入分别约98.48万和49.99万人民币级别，说明老品牌靠规模和稳定供应链还能活得很好。但新品牌表现很差：Fzzcvo 虽然有一条盈利款 B0GVYKT349，利润率13.96%，月销约100件、月收入约42.99万，但另一条 B0G4VPMTRN 直接失败；Folzaelar 两个新款 B0FVFXC99W（-51.85%）和 B0GL6FHJWZ 都亏损；Greatingreat 的 B0FS71G8V4（-1.9%）和 B0G5FFS9JR 也都不赚钱。更关键的是，2025-2026 年新产品里亏损和未成功产品密集出现，2026 年仅 2 个新产品赚钱、9 个不赚钱，说明新进入者在这里大概率先撞上高成本和低利润。
对大品牌来说，这个市场“可进但要重投”，因为能赚钱的样本主要来自 STORAGE MANIAC 这类老品牌，且其新款也只是 18.65% 这种中等利润，不是暴利；对小企业来说，没有足够的真成功案例可复制，且新品牌成功样本 Fzzcvo 也只是 13.96% 的边缘利润，根本不代表稳定可复制，更不支持靠低预算轻松切入。结论很明确：不要进入。 该市场已经表现出明显的低利润、高失败率、强品牌压制特征，小卖家若没有明显创新、品牌和更高预算，不具备现实胜率。
Profitability difficultyModerate Risk Due to Price CompetitionAll products distribution on different profit levels
All products profit ratio distribution, including all products. For products with insufficient sales or missing profit ratio data, they will be categorized into other rows. This distribution included products that cannot determine the release date.
x < -10.0%-10.0% <= x < 0.0%0.0% <= x < 10.0%10.0% <= x < 20.0%20.0% <= x < 30.0%30.0% <= x < 40.0%x >= 40.0%otherNew products distribution on different profit levels
This are the profit ratios of all new products. There are products without sufficient sales, no more than 100pcs in 3 months, or no profit ratio data, or just released. Those will be considered as 'other'
x < -10.0%-10.0% <= x < 0.0%0.0% <= x < 10.0%10.0% <= x < 20.0%20.0% <= x < 30.0%30.0% <= x < 40.0%x >= 40.0%other#Top Products by Net Profit Margin
Top 20 Profitable Products
Most profitable products ranked by profit value. Only includes products with positive profitability and active sales, regardless of release date.
B0DZBZJPH6STORAGE MANIAC2025-03-05Yes$49.24200pcs$9848.017.19%$1692.88B0DGQ4QX5XHodonas2024-10-27Yes$60.16100pcs$6016.019.87%$1195.38B0GGZVLCXDSTORAGE MANIAC2026-01-15Yes$49.99100pcs$4999.018.65%$932.32B0GVYKT349Fzzcvo2026-06-05Yes$42.99100pcs$4299.013.96%$600.15Top 20 Profitable New Products
Most profitable new products ranked by profit value. Only includes newly released products with positive profitability and active sales.
B0GGZVLCXDSTORAGE MANIAC2026-01-15Yes$49.99100pcs$4999.018.65%$932.32B0GVYKT349Fzzcvo2026-06-05Yes$42.99100pcs$4299.013.96%$600.15#New Product Success Rates
Listing这个市场不适合现在进入，核心问题不是“有没有机会”，而是已经接近价格战和高门槛共存的状态。 新品牌几乎没有稳定成功面：新品牌新上架里只有7.69%盈利，整体新产品盈利率也只有13.33%，失败占86.67%；按当前数据看，任何想靠低预算快速切入的小品牌，都很难复制成功。
New products success rate.
What is the ratio of profitable products
Profitable (Unidentifiable released date)Profitable (Old product)Profitable (New product)Profitable (New product on old listing)New products but non profitableProfitable new products divide by brands
What is the ratio of different brands owning all profitable new products
STORAGE MANIACFzzcvoNonprofitable new products divide by brands
What is the ratio of different brands owning all nonprofitable new products
FolzaelarGreatingreatMeikosksKDNVSOther#Success Rate by Entry Time
Listing结论：这个市场不值得进入，已经接近/进入过度拥挤区，价格战风险很高。 近几个月新品几乎清一色失败：新品牌新品成功率只有7.69%，按全部新上架产品算成功率也只有13.33%；而市场里12个新品牌失败、只有1个新品牌出现可盈利样本，说明不是“机会多”，而是“试错成本高、胜率低”。
证据很直接：2025年到2026年新品发布并没有带来更好的结果，反而越来越差——2025年新品牌新品成功率约7.69%，2026年这批样本里可盈利的只有2个、非盈利13个，失败占86.67%。典型失败样本包括 Greatingreat 的 B0FS71G8V4、B0G5FFS9JR，Folzaelar 的 B0FVFXC99W、B0GL6FHJWZ，Meikosks 的 B0GQ3Z95PP、B0GQ3X8LWR，KDNVS 的 B0GT5K3XHP、B0GT5QT6ZQ；这些新品普遍是“常规款、低差异、同质化强”，失败原因集中在缺乏独特性、市场太小或竞争太激烈、利润率偏低。你要特别注意，像 Greatingreat、Folzaelar、Meikosks、KDNVS 这类新品牌并不是你该跟随的成功案例，它们更多是失败样本；真正盈利的新品牌样本只有 Fzzcvo 的 B0GVYKT349，靠的是更清晰的功能差异、双分区、带盖和低价策略，但这只是单点成功，不足以说明市场宽松。
How many products released each year
Y-axis is product counts. X-axis is time period. For each time period, there are 2 column, each column is a released type of a product. Columns are in following orders: New product, New product on old listing
How many products released each month
Y-axis is product counts. X-axis is time period. For each time period, there are 2 column, each column is a released type of a product. Columns are in following orders: New product, New product on old listing
#Net Profit Margins by Entry Time
Different profit ratios of products released in year
Header is the profit ratios and first column is different time period. Each cells includes how many products are relased at the specific timerange and has a corresponding profit ratios. Only profitable and with active sales (more than 100 pcs in 3 months) will be considered. Any products without sufficient sold units in 3 months will be marked as 'other'.
Time/Profit% x < -10.0% -10.0% <= x < 0.0% 0.0% <= x < 10.0% 10.0% <= x < 20.0% 20.0% <= x < 30.0% 30.0% <= x < 40.0% x >= 40.0% other 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2024 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 3 2026 1 0 0 2 0 0 0 9 ≥ 10% Profitable< 10% UnprofitableUnidentifiableDifferent profit ratios of products released in month
Header is the profit ratios and first column is different time period. Each cells includes how many products are relased at the specific timerange and has a corresponding profit ratios. Only profitable and with active sales (more than 100 pcs in 3 months) will be considered. Any products without sufficient sold units in 3 months will be marked as 'other'.
Time/Profit% x < -10.0% -10.0% <= x < 0.0% 0.0% <= x < 10.0% 10.0% <= x < 20.0% 20.0% <= x < 30.0% 30.0% <= x < 40.0% x >= 40.0% other 2025/7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2025/10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/11 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2026/1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2026/2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2026/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2026/4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2026/6 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 ≥ 10% Profitable< 10% UnprofitableUnidentifiable#Case Study
Success CasesHodonas Rolling Laundry Hamper 2-Section, Beige, 31.5"Lx15.75W"x30.7"H
This listing is deemed profitablePrice (USD)$60.16Released TypeOld Release (2024-10-27)Brand is an old entry in this marketSize and Weight42.3 x 34.3 x 9.2 cm, 3629.00gProfitable Factors
Based on old ASINDistinct functions and featuresUnique appearance designDesign & Appearance
米色款更偏家居软装风格，视觉上比竞品深色/工业风款更柔和。, 双分区滚轮脏衣篮，带可拆洗内袋与带刹车万向轮，整体更接近“移动式分拣收纳车”的形态。Key Buying Motive
双30.5加仑分区，适合按深浅色或家庭成员直接分类收纳；可拆卸且可机洗内袋，清洁维护更省事。Target Customers
适合需要在卧室、洗衣房、浴室之间频繁移动，并且希望提前分拣衣物的家庭用户。Early Investment
Investment
Monthly Revenue (Recent) (USD)$6,016.00100 sold in the past 30 days · as of 2026年7月Net Profit Margin
Sea Freight15.16% / 19.87%Peak / Non PeakRail Freight- / -Peak / Non PeakAir Freight-14.24% / -9.53%Peak / Non PeakSales & BSR Performance
STORAGE MANIACB0DZBZJPH6 (4.8/5 (1023 Reviews))STORAGE MANIAC Commercial Laundry Hamper with Heavy Duty Steel Frame, 160 L Industrial Laundry Basket Cart with Wheels for Hotel, Home, Laundry Room, 17.72''L x 17.72''W x 30.91''H, Medium Black
This listing is deemed profitablePrice (USD)$49.24Released TypeOld Release (2025-03-05)Brand is an old entry in this marketSize and Weight41.8 x 25.8 x 9.0 cm, 3089.00gProfitable Factors
Based on old ASINEstablished brand with longevityDesign & Appearance
黑色工业风外观，比竞品的绿色、米色、浅蓝更偏向酒店/商业清洁场景, 160L大容量滚轮收纳车，带重型钢架和可锁定脚轮，整体更偏商用推车形态Key Buying Motive
重型钢架+可刹车万向轮，适合频繁移动和固定使用Target Customers
面向酒店、宿舍、洗衣房及大户型家庭等需要大容量、可移动收纳的用户Early Investment
Investment
Monthly Revenue (Recent) (USD)$9,848.00200 sold in the past 30 days · as of 2026年7月Net Profit Margin
Sea Freight12.71% / 17.19%Peak / Non PeakRail Freight- / -Peak / Non PeakAir Freight-17.87% / -13.39%Peak / Non PeakSales & BSR Performance
Loading samples... 50%