- Benchmark ASINB0FH24PNSV
- MarketplaceUS
- Category ID206234614011
- Analyzed Products
- Keywordgame card case
- Price Range-
- Minimum Net Profit Margin10.00%
- MOQ100
- Est. Purchasing CostNo price data
- Data Date2026-07-10
- Your Budget (for new listing) (CNY)¥500,000.00
Report summary from Keble AI Agent: Listing
这个市场不值得进入，结论很明确：已经是低利润、强同质化、接近价格战的盘面。 目前可见的新增品牌数是0，但这不是蓝海信号，而是说明真正的新品牌根本没进来；新增产品只有3个，且新发布成功率是0.00%，连已在场的 ASTONEY 和 KKOZESST 也没有跑出任何可验证的新成功案例。
Recommended Products Features Direction
These products have successfully captured market share and are profitable. Their design and features are suggested for your investment, based on market competition, saturation, and demand.
New Brands
VS
Old Brands
Green indicates better success rate, red indicates poorer success rate. If you are a new brand, focus on the left side; if you are an old brand, focus on the right side.
Old Brands
#Budget Requirement
Listing结论很明确：这个市场不值得进入，且你现在的50万CNY预算也不够形成安全入场。 目前看到的样本里，新品盈利率是0.00%，整体盈利率也是0.00%，这不是机会型市场，而是明显的低回报、强竞争盘面；对小商家尤其不友好。
Early sourcing + logistics + marketing budget (USD)N/AExplains the budgetWith all these investments, who has profitable new releases
How many new listings are released by old brands?100.00%New listing success rate (old brands):0.00%Alternatives- 使用原包装盒/原装卡匣盒：如果用户只是临时存放少量游戏卡，很多人会直接用主机原盒或卡带原包装，不需要额外购买收纳盒，成本最低。
- 用便宜的通用小号塑料收纳盒分格替代：文具/零件/药盒类小盒子通常更便宜、到处都能买到，拿来装少量卡带也足够，购买门槛更低。
- 使用钥匙扣式小卡包或零钱包改装收纳：这类现成小包价格通常低于专用游戏卡盒，便携性高，适合少量随身携带。
- 把卡带放进可重新封口的透明小袋/自封袋：几乎零成本，适合短期整理、运输或防尘临时使用，是最便宜的替代方案之一。
- 利用抽屉分隔盒/桌面整理盒顺带收纳：如果用户本来就有办公整理盒，可直接借用，无需再买专用游戏卡盒，属于低成本“顺手替代”。
Alternative solutions may pose a risk to your investment in certain markets.
#Brands Investment Analysis
Listing这个市场不值得进入：样本里可判定盈利的产品为0%，新发布产品盈利率也是0%，而且目前看到的全是老品牌在做同类公模，说明已经进入价格战+高度同质化阶段。对小商家来说几乎没有胜算；对大品牌来说也不是好市场，除非愿意带着明显差异化和较高投入硬打，但从当前数据看，仍然不推荐。
Old brand with the most profitable new productsASTONEY
Recent Monthly Revenue (USD):-(-)B0FH2LD8XL (5/5 (2 Reviews))Brand is an old entry in this marketOld ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQOld ReleaseNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQ
Recent Monthly Revenue (USD):-(-)B0FH2JJF8L (5/5 (2 Reviews))Brand is an old entry in this marketOld ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQOld ReleaseNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQRecent Monthly Revenue (USD):-(-)B0GFSYHD2CBrand is an old entry in this marketNew ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQUnderperformingNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQ#Differentiations
Unique productsCommon productsDifferentiation:- 透明迷你盒+钥匙扣，便携感强，适合外出随身携带
- |
- 10只装有数量感，购买价值直观，更容易吸引点击
- |
- 清晰可见卡面，功能一眼明了，图片转化友好
B0FGY2HBLZ (5/5 (5 Reviews))Brand is an old entry in this marketOld ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQOld ReleaseNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQSales & BSR
Differentiation:- 10只装+清透外壳，整体展示更饱满，视觉上更有吸引力
- |
- 单卡+Micro SD双收纳，功能明确，适合轻度玩家和旅行用户
- |
- 外观简洁统一，图片看起来整齐专业，容易促成购买
B0FH2LD8XL (5/5 (2 Reviews))Brand is an old entry in this marketOld ReleaseInsufficient Sales to Meet MOQOld ReleaseNot enough sales volume to meet 100 MOQSales & BSR
#Net Profit Margins: All vs New
Listing这个市场不适合进入：利润结构偏低、可验证的新品牌成功案例几乎没有，整体更像低毛利价格战区。 以当前样本看，已知利润分布里只有 11.11% 的产品低于10%，但这批数据里能看到的“新上架”核心样本几乎全部是失败品；更关键的是，2026年1月这批新上架 3 个 ASIN（ASTONEY 的 B0GFSYHD2C、KKOZESST 的 B0GFVKT5Z9 / B0GFW4G47L）全部未盈利，等于新进入者的即时成功率是 0%。
大品牌视角：要进也只能靠重资产和品牌势能，不是普通资金能轻松切入。 当前用户预算是 50万人民币，但报告里已明确提醒，单个ASIN预算只够前期进货、物流和营销，不包含研发、品牌和认证；而失败样本里连 $14.99 的产品都无法跑通，说明这个赛道不是“加点预算就能赢”，而是需要更强品牌力或差异化投入。已知可观察到的“新上架”品牌几乎只有 ASTONEY 和 KKOZESST，且它们的 3 个新ASIN全失败，B0FH2LD8XL、B0FH2JJF8L、B0FGY2HBLZ、B0FGXZRXM3、B0FGXYC1GF、B0FH24PNSV 这些低价位产品里，能看到的利润区间也主要落在 10%~30% 左右，真正高利润并没有出现，说明不是高毛利蓝海。
Profitability difficultyUnknown - Insufficient New ReleasesAll products distribution on different profit levels
All products profit ratio distribution, including all products. For products with insufficient sales or missing profit ratio data, they will be categorized into other rows. This distribution included products that cannot determine the release date.
x < -10.0%-10.0% <= x < 0.0%0.0% <= x < 10.0%10.0% <= x < 20.0%20.0% <= x < 30.0%30.0% <= x < 40.0%x >= 40.0%otherNew products distribution on different profit levels
This are the profit ratios of all new products. There are products without sufficient sales, no more than 100pcs in 3 months, or no profit ratio data, or just released. Those will be considered as 'other'
x < -10.0%-10.0% <= x < 0.0%0.0% <= x < 10.0%10.0% <= x < 20.0%20.0% <= x < 30.0%30.0% <= x < 40.0%x >= 40.0%other#Top Products by Net Profit Margin
Top 20 Non-Profitable Products
Products with negative profitability ranked by lowest profit value. Only includes products classified as non-profitable regardless of release date.
B0FH2LD8XLASTONEY2025-07-08No$14.99-pcs$-19.29%$-B0FH2JJF8LASTONEY2025-07-08No$14.99-pcs$-14.89%$-B0FGY2HBLZKKOZESST2025-07-07No$14.99-pcs$-20.04%$-
B0FGXZRXM3KKOZESST2025-07-07No$14.99-pcs$-20.04%$-
B0FGXYC1GFKKOZESST2025-07-07No$14.99-pcs$-19.2%$-B0FH24PNSVGeneric2025-07-08No$18.64-pcs$-9.05%$-B0GFSYHD2CASTONEY2026-01-09No$--pcs$--%$-B0GFVKT5Z9KKOZESST2026-01-09No$--pcs$--%$-B0GFW4G47LKKOZESST2026-01-09No$--pcs$--%$-Top 20 Non-Profitable New Products
New products with negative profitability ranked by lowest profit value. Only includes newly released products classified as non-profitable.
B0GFSYHD2CASTONEY2026-01-09No$--pcs$--%$-B0GFVKT5Z9KKOZESST2026-01-09No$--pcs$--%$-B0GFW4G47LKKOZESST2026-01-09No$--pcs$--%$-#New Product Success Rates
Listing这个市场不值得进入：新品成功率为0%，全部3个新发布都失败，且成功样本中没有任何真正可验证的新品牌小商家成功案例。 现有数据只显示老品牌ASTONEY和KKOZESST在新发布上全军覆没，市场更像是一个已经陷入价格压缩和同质化竞争的区域，不是适合新卖家切入的机会。
证据非常直接。 新发布总数只有3个，盈利率0.00%；老品牌新发布盈利率也是0.00%，说明连已有品牌都无法把新产品做成。ASTONEY目前可识别的3个产品里，0个盈利、3个不盈利，品牌级盈利率为0%；其新产品B0GFSYHD2C不盈利，老产品B0FH2LD8XL和B0FH2JJF8L的利润率分别只有19.29%和14.89%，但都没有形成可持续销量。KKOZESST也同样失败，B0FGY2HBLZ、B0FGXZRXM3、B0FGXYC1GF都不盈利。更关键的是，市场里可见的产品高度同质化：B0FH2LD8XL和B0FGY2HBLZ都只是普通透明迷你卡盒、单卡+Micro SD双收纳，没有明显差异化。再加上顶部非盈利样本里出现了大量“新品牌/新发布”失败项，说明这个类目不是靠普通上新就能跑出来的；如果要硬进，必须准备明显高于常规单ASIN启动预算的研发、品牌和营销投入，但即便如此也没有看到足够的正向案例支撑。
结论：不要进。 对大品牌来说，这里没有可复制的赢家模型；对小商家来说，更没有合法、低门槛的成功样本。若强行进入，至少要警惕这类市场会逼近“靠重营销和冲量”的打法，但当前数据不足以证明这种打法能稳定赚钱，反而显示是高风险失败市场。
New products success rate.
What is the ratio of profitable products
Profitable (Unidentifiable released date)Profitable (Old product)Profitable (New product)Profitable (New product on old listing)New products but non profitableNo data availableNonprofitable new products divide by brands
What is the ratio of different brands owning all nonprofitable new products
ASTONEYKKOZESST#Success Rate by Entry Time
Listing这个市场不适合进入，结论非常明确：已进入价格战/低利润陷阱，新品牌没有真实机会。 关键原因不是“还有没有人做”，而是最近新增的全是老品牌在推新款，新进入品牌数为0，最近3个新发布ASIN全部不盈利，说明市场根本没有给真正新玩家留出空间。
证据很直接：过去一年和最近月份的新增都几乎为零，2026年只看到3个新发布，且全部来自老品牌 ASTONEY、KKOZESST，盈利率是0%；市场里已识别的可盈利/不可盈利样本也全部显示为其他状态，真正可确认盈利的比例为0.00%。 从时间趋势看，2026年1月出现3个新发布后，后面月份没有继续放量，说明不是成长型机会，而是少数老品牌在试探性补货或用老listing延伸。再看产品层面，ASTONEY 的3个样本里，2个旧款虽然表面利润率有19.29%和14.89%，但都被判定为不盈利/无销量，1个新款 B0GFSYHD2C 也是不盈利；B0FGXZRXM3、B0FGY2HBLZ、B0FH2JJF8L、B0FH2LD8XL 等产品都指向同一个问题：外观通用、缺乏差异化、需求太小、竞争太挤。这里没有看到“<300 评价的真实小卖家成功案例”，反而更像老品牌在压价和清库存。用户预算 500000 CNY 虽然看起来足够覆盖单个 ASIN 前期投入，但在这种市场里，预算不是门槛，市场本身没有可复制的成功路径。
短结论：不要做。 如果你硬要进入，只能跟着老品牌做同质化产品，风险极高，且不需要更高预算就已经很难活；这不是适合大品牌扩张的市场，也不是适合小品牌试水的市场。
How many products released each year
Y-axis is product counts. X-axis is time period. For each time period, there are 2 column, each column is a released type of a product. Columns are in following orders: New product, New product on old listing
How many products released each month
Y-axis is product counts. X-axis is time period. For each time period, there are 2 column, each column is a released type of a product. Columns are in following orders: New product, New product on old listing
#Net Profit Margins by Entry Time
Different profit ratios of products released in year
Header is the profit ratios and first column is different time period. Each cells includes how many products are relased at the specific timerange and has a corresponding profit ratios. Only profitable and with active sales (more than 100 pcs in 3 months) will be considered. Any products without sufficient sold units in 3 months will be marked as 'other'.
Time/Profit% x < -10.0% -10.0% <= x < 0.0% 0.0% <= x < 10.0% 10.0% <= x < 20.0% 20.0% <= x < 30.0% 30.0% <= x < 40.0% x >= 40.0% other 2022 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2023 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2024 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 ≥ 10% Profitable< 10% UnprofitableUnidentifiableDifferent profit ratios of products released in month
Header is the profit ratios and first column is different time period. Each cells includes how many products are relased at the specific timerange and has a corresponding profit ratios. Only profitable and with active sales (more than 100 pcs in 3 months) will be considered. Any products without sufficient sold units in 3 months will be marked as 'other'.
Time/Profit% x < -10.0% -10.0% <= x < 0.0% 0.0% <= x < 10.0% 10.0% <= x < 20.0% 20.0% <= x < 30.0% 30.0% <= x < 40.0% x >= 40.0% other 2025/7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2025/12 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2026/2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2026/6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ≥ 10% Profitable< 10% UnprofitableUnidentifiable#Case Study
Success Cases