
这个市场不建议进入:已经是明显的价格战区,而且对新品牌和小品牌都不友好。 目前只有 1 个新品牌 Enzeno,但它的 2 个新上架产品全部不盈利,新品牌成功率是 0%;同时老品牌 Stanbroil 也没有盈利样本,说明这不是“新手没做对”,而是整个类目利润被压扁了。
证据很直接:新产品利润率集中在 0%~10% 低位,最近入场也没有改善。 新品里 Enzeno 的 B0FPMFPPBB 售价 C$18.15,月销 50,预估前期投入约 C$2,722.50,利润率只有 9.85%;另一款 B0G33NTW7L 售价 C$14.13,月销 50,利润率只有 5.64%。按市场样本看,5 个样本里 4 个是非盈利,且新品牌两款新货全部失败,说明这是低毛利、强同质化、价格互杀的市场。品牌层面,Enzeno 虽然能做到约 C$161,400 的月营收和 100 件月销量,但 0% 盈利率说明销量并不能换来利润;Stanbroil 作为老品牌,B01LSHRJ0M 仍是 -3.21% 利润率,且评论 1,896,属于典型的大牌也守不住利润的信号。
两种进入方式都不成立。 大品牌若要进,至少要按 C$2,700+ 的单品试水预算起步,还不包含研发、品牌和认证成本;但进入后看到的不是高利润,而是和 Stanbroil 一样被压到亏损。小品牌更不该进,因为没有真正可信的 <300 评价成功样本,反而存在评论 151 但利润率仍只有 5.64%/9.85% 的“表面能卖、实际不赚钱”案例。结论很明确:不要进入;如果硬要做,只能靠更强的产品差异、品牌投入和更激进的营销去抢量,但这已经是红海打法,不是好机会。
These products have successfully captured market share and are profitable. Their design and features are suggested for your investment, based on market competition, saturation, and demand.
Green indicates better success rate, red indicates poorer success rate. If you are a new brand, focus on the left side; if you are an old brand, focus on the right side.
结论:不建议进入,这个市场已经是价格战区,且明显偏向过度竞争。 用户预算 50万 CNY 当然“能付得起”单个 ASIN 的前期启动,但从数据看,这个预算只够做入场,不够撑起长期竞争;更关键的是,市场里已出现新品牌 Enzeno 的两款新上架产品都不盈利,而老品牌 Stanbroil 的样本也同样不盈利,说明不是“谁更省钱谁赢”,而是整个赛道被同质化和低毛利拖死了。
Alternative solutions may pose a risk to your investment in certain markets.
这个市场不值得进入:已明显是价格战市场,且新品牌几乎没有成功样本。 目前可见的新品牌 Enzeno 两个新 ASIN 都是亏损,市场新上架产品盈利率为 0%,整体可复制性很差。
这个市场不适合现在进入:已经明显是低利润、强竞争的价格战市场。 新品牌这边只有 Enzeno,且两款新发布产品利润率都只有 5.64% 和 9.85%,全部低于你要求的 15% 合格线;整体样本里 5 个产品中 4 个处在 10% 以下或更差,说明不是健康竞争,而是被成本和平台费用压得很薄。
All products profit ratio distribution, including all products. For products with insufficient sales or missing profit ratio data, they will be categorized into other rows. This distribution included products that cannot determine the release date.
This are the profit ratios of all new products. There are products without sufficient sales, no more than 20pcs in 3 months, or no profit ratio data, or just released. Those will be considered as 'other'
Products with negative profitability ranked by lowest profit value. Only includes products classified as non-profitable regardless of release date.
![]() | B01LSHRJ0M | Stanbroil | 2017-06-27 | No | C$18.99 | 50pcs | C$949.5 | -3.21% | C$-30.47 |
![]() | B0G33NTW7L | Enzeno | 2026-05-31 | No | C$14.13 | 50pcs | C$706.5 | 5.64% | C$39.85 |
![]() | B0FPMFPPBB | Enzeno | 2025-12-06 | No | C$18.15 | 50pcs | C$907.5 | 9.85% | C$89.39 |
![]() | B096572NRH | Angoily | 2021-05-29 | No | C$20.71 | -pcs | C$- | -0.38% | C$- |
![]() | B086QK93PN | Stanbroil | 2016-12-23 | No | C$- | -pcs | C$- | -% | C$- |
New products with negative profitability ranked by lowest profit value. Only includes newly released products classified as non-profitable.
![]() | B0G33NTW7L | Enzeno | 2026-05-31 | No | C$14.13 | 50pcs | C$706.5 | 5.64% | C$39.85 |
![]() | B0FPMFPPBB | Enzeno | 2025-12-06 | No | C$18.15 | 50pcs | C$907.5 | 9.85% | C$89.39 |
这个市场不适合进入:新品牌新品盈利率为0%,整体可识别利润率也只有0%,而已出现的两个新产品都落在9.8%左右的低利润区,属于明显的价格战/低利润市场。 目前没有任何真正能证明“新品牌轻松赚钱”的样本,反而是 Enzeno 这个新进入品牌的两个新品都亏损或不达标,说明新人进去后大概率会被同质化和费用结构压住。
What is the ratio of profitable products
What is the ratio of different brands owning all nonprofitable new products
这个市场不值得进入,结论很明确:已进入价格战区,而且对新品牌不友好。 目前能看到的新品牌样本里,Enzeno 两个新发布 ASIN 都不盈利,且新品牌成功率是 0%,最近的入场结果也是连续失败;这不是“还可以试试”的市场,而是高风险、低回报的市场。
证据很直接:新品牌没有跑通,老品牌也被压到亏损,说明竞争已经把利润打穿。 Enzeno 的 B0FPMFPPBB 售价 C$18.15,月销 50,早期投入约 C$2,722.50,但利润率只有 9.8%,连“可盈利”门槛都没跨过去;另一款 B0G33NTW7L 售价 C$14.13,月销 50,利润率只有 5.64%,更差。老品牌 Stanbroil 的 B01LSHRJ0M 也只有 -3.21% 利润率,虽然月销 50、评论 1,896,但依然亏损,说明这个类目里销量不等于赚钱,而且老牌子也守不住利润。按你的规则看,最近新入场产品全是失败,成功率 0%,这已经是典型的严重拥挤市场;再加上现有样本里盈利率门槛连 10% 都难达到,实际就是低价互杀。
对两种进入方式的判断都是否定的。 大品牌如果硬进,要准备至少接近 C$2,700 起步的单品试水成本,并且还不含研发、品牌、认证等长期投入,才能复制这种“勉强有销量但没利润”的结果;小品牌更不该进,因为样本里没有真正可信的“小品牌成功案例”,新品牌成功率 0%,而且现有新品牌都是失败。若要勉强竞争,只能靠更强的品牌预算、改款、投放和更激进的营销,但这已经不是健康机会,而是需要高投入才能挤进去的红海。
Y-axis is product counts. X-axis is time period. For each time period, there are 2 column, each column is a released type of a product. Columns are in following orders: New product, New product on old listing
Y-axis is product counts. X-axis is time period. For each time period, there are 2 column, each column is a released type of a product. Columns are in following orders: New product, New product on old listing
Header is the profit ratios and first column is different time period. Each cells includes how many products are relased at the specific timerange and has a corresponding profit ratios. Only profitable and with active sales (more than 20 pcs in 3 months) will be considered. Any products without sufficient sold units in 3 months will be marked as 'other'.
| Time/Profit% | x < -10.0% | -10.0% <= x < 0.0% | 0.0% <= x < 10.0% | 10.0% <= x < 20.0% | 20.0% <= x < 30.0% | 30.0% <= x < 40.0% | x >= 40.0% | other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2023 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2024 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Header is the profit ratios and first column is different time period. Each cells includes how many products are relased at the specific timerange and has a corresponding profit ratios. Only profitable and with active sales (more than 20 pcs in 3 months) will be considered. Any products without sufficient sold units in 3 months will be marked as 'other'.
| Time/Profit% | x < -10.0% | -10.0% <= x < 0.0% | 0.0% <= x < 10.0% | 10.0% <= x < 20.0% | 20.0% <= x < 30.0% | 30.0% <= x < 40.0% | x >= 40.0% | other |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025/7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025/8 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025/9 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025/10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025/11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2025/12 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026/2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026/3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026/4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026/5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2026/6 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |